W A R N I N G !
W A R N I N G !
This page is full of non-facts and bullsh!t, (just like the internet and especially forums and other blogs), please do not believe entirely without exercising your intellect. Any resemblance to real things in reality is purely coincidental. You are free to interpret/misinterpret the content however you like, most likely for entertainment, but in no case is the text written on this blog the absolute truth. The blog owner and Blogger are not responsible for any misunderstanding of ASCII characters as facts. *cough* As I was saying, you are free to interpret however you like. *cough*
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Monday, April 26, 2010
An interesting subwoofer
This graph shows its frequency response in different placements -
The "Far from the wall" looks to be the best - it has the flattest frequency curve.
Hmm... a subwoofer designed to be placed far from the wall.
The "Far from the wall" looks to be the best - it has the flattest frequency curve.
Hmm... a subwoofer designed to be placed far from the wall.
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Inside Philips SWA6311 coaxial audio cable
Found out by accident that the RCA plug can be unscrewed to reveal the inside.
They really care a lot about reliability (pronounced "no short circuit") in commercial products. Minimal amount of exposure, a layer of insulation around the center connector, possibly heatshrink.
The fact that it can be unscrewed plus the quality of the packaging make me suspect it to be a China clone job. But no biggie, it is still professionally done, much better than overpriced and off-spec cables made in Singapore.
They really care a lot about reliability (pronounced "no short circuit") in commercial products. Minimal amount of exposure, a layer of insulation around the center connector, possibly heatshrink.
The fact that it can be unscrewed plus the quality of the packaging make me suspect it to be a China clone job. But no biggie, it is still professionally done, much better than overpriced and off-spec cables made in Singapore.
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Hand-braided S/PDIF cables:
http://www.xtremeplace.com/yabbse/index.php?topic=74222.0
Hand-braided S/PDIF cables... now I've seen it all.
Hand-braided S/PDIF cables... now I've seen it all.
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
If it can be reverse-engineered by a kid, it isn't worth reverse-engineering... or designing in the first place
Somebody was complaining to me that it is bad to reverse-engineer a product.
I prefer to call it convergent development.
I prefer to call it convergent development.
Quote of the day:
"Audio as a hobby is dying, largely by its own hand. As far as the real world is concerned, high-end audio lost its credibility during the 1980s, when it flatly refused to submit to the kind of basic honesty controls (double-blind testing, for example) that had legitimized every other serious scientific endeavor since Pascal. [This refusal] is a source of endless derisive amusement among rational people and of perpetual embarrassment for me..."
--J Gordon Holt.
--J Gordon Holt.
Sunday, April 11, 2010
Ever bought something on impulse thinking it is cheap then finding out other another place is selling it cheaper at everyday prices?
Like PC shows, for example - where everything is at least the same price as normal, if not higher.
Well I just found out that I got pwned. No it's not the Philips cables - those are excellent buys, it's something else not tech related.
And probably because it's not tech related I got my bullsh!t radar turned off, or I was just too stressed since I went out to de-stress.
Well I just found out that I got pwned. No it's not the Philips cables - those are excellent buys, it's something else not tech related.
And probably because it's not tech related I got my bullsh!t radar turned off, or I was just too stressed since I went out to de-stress.
Saturday, April 10, 2010
MX5020.6
The upgrade part for the MX5020.5 finally came in today - my old Sony SRS-D4 subwoofer; I can't call it trusty because its power button is still not yet fixed, because I didn't have the time to fix it the last time I went home.
Friday, April 9, 2010
Saturday, April 3, 2010
Random thought of the day:
Friction resists motion and is hence undesired
But on a car, between the wheel and the ground, friction is wanted as much as possible
Interesting invention, the wheel.
But on a car, between the wheel and the ground, friction is wanted as much as possible
Interesting invention, the wheel.
Labels:
rtotd
Thursday, April 1, 2010
Computer myth: Having a bigger/better CPU/GPU heatsink makes the rest of the system hotter
It is not true, and I shall provide the explanation - physics style.
There is a myth that a bigger heatsink dumps heat faster to the surrounding hence heats the surrounding up.
While that is true if talking about lower thermal resistance...
But understand where the heat is coming from.
All of the heat energy is coming from the graphics card.
And all this heat energy will have to be dissipated to the surrounding. Regardless of the size of the heatsink
i.e. rate of heat transfer is constant (to be precise, when the graphics card temperature stabilizes)
A smaller heatsink just means a higher temperature before this amount of heat transfer takes place - since rate of heat transfer is dependent on temperature difference between the two.
To illustrate, an example -
A 50W gfx card, a 1°C/W lousy heatsink, and a 0.5°C/W decent heatsink (in comparison, good CPU coolers are 0.25°C/W and lower), with air temperature at 30°C constant.
The same 50W gfx card will reach 50W x 1°C/W + 30°C = 80°C on the lousy heatsink, and 50W x 1°C/W + 30°C = 55°C on the decent heatsink.
But both will dump 50W of heat into the surrounding. Just at different temperatures.
There is a myth that a bigger heatsink dumps heat faster to the surrounding hence heats the surrounding up.
While that is true if talking about lower thermal resistance...
But understand where the heat is coming from.
All of the heat energy is coming from the graphics card.
And all this heat energy will have to be dissipated to the surrounding. Regardless of the size of the heatsink
i.e. rate of heat transfer is constant (to be precise, when the graphics card temperature stabilizes)
A smaller heatsink just means a higher temperature before this amount of heat transfer takes place - since rate of heat transfer is dependent on temperature difference between the two.
To illustrate, an example -
A 50W gfx card, a 1°C/W lousy heatsink, and a 0.5°C/W decent heatsink (in comparison, good CPU coolers are 0.25°C/W and lower), with air temperature at 30°C constant.
The same 50W gfx card will reach 50W x 1°C/W + 30°C = 80°C on the lousy heatsink, and 50W x 1°C/W + 30°C = 55°C on the decent heatsink.
But both will dump 50W of heat into the surrounding. Just at different temperatures.
Labels:
tech
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)