People may get the wrong idea reading that graph, so to reduce the amount of rubbish on the internet, I decided to do a retest with a 12V power adapter this time.
Results are shocking.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37e2c/37e2c43f7a05bc1fb0103140733267fa9b6748fd" alt=""
The EMU wasn't cooperative that day, and I was in a rush, so I didn't bother getting 0.001% THD. But this is good enough to show the previous measured performance of the OPA2604, which was shocking bad as >0.01%.
The first thing to notice is the numbers for THD dropped by an order of magnitude.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25f55/25f55c54a6bc3f08a828af18f1c74cd6a83fa724" alt=""
Now it measures okay. Most of the spikes are EMU's "noise floor" (for the lack of a better term that I know).
And yup, this is with 9V battery. So the issue wasn't insufficient voltage. This is an example of why control measurements are important, for if I had measured only 12V scenario, I would had gotten a different and wrong conclusion.
The main difference is the greatly-reduced even harmonics.
My guess for the cause? Is not going to be something groundbreaking - probably a bad contact.
Other graphs are similar, 12V and/or 33Ω load, so I won't go into that. Into 33Ω for both cases THD is 0.005+% but how much of it would be due the the EMU? Even-order harmonics did increase with current draw as with the case of OPA2132. Speaking of which, now I wonder how accurate are the measurements for OPA2132, particularly the 0.015% reading.
So here I declare the previous OPA2604 measurements invalid. Some others might also be questionable.
No comments:
Post a Comment