Moron of the day:

Alessandro MS-1 Headphone Bid, Goes Over The Retail Price, Why?

"You know I hate people paying overboard for headphones, but when it comes to people bidding over the odds for used gear, it really gets my goat up. I saw this weekend a pair of Alessandro MS-1 headphones which had reached over £53, and that’s not including the shipping cost, and there was a day or so bidding time left.

Sorry, I forget to mark it, and watch the final bid. However even at a bid price of £53 plus shipping on top (which if I can remember rightly was £7) I new the game was over, and that some poor person was paying way over the top. Much as everyone loves Alessandro, personally, I love saving money more, and this site/blog is here to make sure we all get a fair price.

At today’s exchange rate, the Alessandro MS-1’s are:

99.00 USD = 50.8334 GBP

And that includes shipping! Sorry to whoever, paid over the top. Although in all fairness, you’ve got a lovely pair of headphones."

Source

While this applies not only to audio when it comes to online auctions (there are always morons out there, both buyers and sellers who think that something is worth much more than what it is), it also happens rather frequently in audio for new items. A lot of times people pay more for something not worth its price, especially popular consumer big brand names. Note that I'm not just talking about brands that are widely known by a normal consumer, but also other less big brand names like ******* and ****** (censored, insert the brand you want here) that are hyped up by specific interest groups. It's all for a sense of security, wanting to feel that you made the right decision, so you follow the words and actions of others for that and in order to be accepted. Actions are still okay, how right are the words? Think about it.

Pyramid scheme

(still looking for a job... i think)

Looking at some non-agency-based job offers, seems like there are still traces of it here and there.

Sad that there are still fellow Singaporeans falling for it.

Meh, natural selection.

Random thought of the day

Somebody somewhere once said that, "hybrid tube-SS amp combines the disadvantages of both"

I saw the same thing today on TV.

No not tube amps. Starhuck's digital TV broadcast is well-known for being full of digital compression artifects, most noticably the macroblocks. But on top from that I'm also seeing analogue noise.

That's because I'm connected via the RF coaxial cable.

So, now we're getting both analogue and digital artifects by switching to DTV. Hooray.

One more entry for Murphy's law:

Bugs (in computers) tend to happen only when you're asleep and when you left the computer on overnight to do something important that would take a long time and is time-essential

Quote of the day:

"Up to -20dB ambient moise rejection"

So... it rejects ambient moise? Moisture I presume? But since when is humidity measured in dB?

Quote of the day (super good!!!)

"IIRC, the reason why optical cables are 2m only is precisely because that's about the limit for their use. It wasn't designed to be used for long distances. I would think at longer distances you might get better results with SPDIF."

This statement is so good, I don't even need to explain why.

And no, it's not by me, even though I do write a lot of bullsh!t on this blog, but that's why I have a blog, to contain all my bullsh!t instead of sending it flying on the forums.

This quote actually existed and is found on the net. Existed since 77 minutes ago and found 29 minutes ago to be precise.

Also, no need to comment to explain the technical details, I know, you know, many already know, you'd be better off writing that on the forums. Gets more rep points, too.